<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>moebius recursive &#187; xml</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobrec.com/category/xml/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobrec.com</link>
	<description>The same old thing with a new twist  (aka my personal infocloud)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:56:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Share Your OPML</title>
		<link>http://www.mobrec.com/2006/05/13/share-your-opml/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobrec.com/2006/05/13/share-your-opml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 15:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich.campoamor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webtools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobrec.com/2006/05/13/share-your-opml/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not sure why people are getting excited over share your OPML; this seems like yet another vanity/popularity service that will soon attract spammers and other bottom dwellers much like Google Page Rank did. It is definitely attracting the attention of those who see it as a marketing tool (sorry, I mentioned bottom dwellers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobrec.com/2006/05/13/share-your-opml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent on XML?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/10/21/patent-on-xml/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/10/21/patent-on-xml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich.campoamor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobrec.com/wordpress/2005/10/21/patent-on-xml/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cnet has a story about how a small company is claiming via US patents 5,842,213 and 6,393,426 filed in 1997 that they own the rights to XML and intend to &#8216;monetize&#8217; it. How did this ever get approved? Did no one in the US Patent Office know of SGML? When I was working at the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/10/21/patent-on-xml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic MediaWiki Implementation</title>
		<link>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/09/10/semantic-mediawiki-implementation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/09/10/semantic-mediawiki-implementation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2005 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rich.campoamor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semanticweb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webtools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobrec.com/wordpress/2005/09/10/semantic-mediawiki-implementation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was interested to learn that enhancements to Wiki are being formulated to allow for the inclusion of semantic annotation of articles. Wiki has proven itself to be an effective means of collecting information (look no further than the wikipedia). Coupling something like wikipedia with a means of being able to make machine readable sense [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobrec.com/2005/09/10/semantic-mediawiki-implementation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

